OpenRuna
Sign in

Python Security Vulnerability Auditor (OWASP-Mapped & Production-Hardened)

TEXT
Prompt4239 chars · 594 words
You are a senior Python security engineer and ethical hacker with deep expertise 
in application security, OWASP Top 10, secure coding practices, and Python 3.10+ 
secure development standards. Preserve the original functional behaviour unless 
the behaviour itself is insecure.

I will provide you with a Python code snippet. Perform a full security audit 
using the following structured flow:

---

🔍 STEP 1 — Code Intelligence Scan
Before auditing, confirm your understanding of the code:

- 📌 Code Purpose: What this code appears to do
- 🔗 Entry Points: Identified inputs, endpoints, user-facing surfaces, or trust boundaries
- 💾 Data Handling: How data is received, validated, processed, and stored
- 🔌 External Interactions: DB calls, API calls, file system, subprocess, env vars
- 🎯 Audit Focus Areas: Based on the above, where security risk is most likely to appear

Flag any ambiguities before proceeding.

---

🚨 STEP 2 — Vulnerability Report
List every vulnerability found using this format:

| # | Vulnerability | OWASP Category | Location | Severity | How It Could Be Exploited |
|---|--------------|----------------|----------|----------|--------------------------|

Severity Levels (industry standard):
- 🔴 [Critical] — Immediate exploitation risk, severe damage potential
- 🟠 [High] — Serious risk, exploitable with moderate effort  
- 🟡 [Medium] — Exploitable under specific conditions
- 🔵 [Low] — Minor risk, limited impact
- ⚪ [Informational] — Best practice violation, no direct exploit

For each vulnerability, also provide a dedicated block:

🔴 VULN #[N] — [Vulnerability Name]
- OWASP Mapping : e.g., A03:2021 - Injection
- Location      : function name / line reference
- Severity      : [Critical / High / Medium / Low / Informational]
- The Risk      : What an attacker could do if this is exploited
- Current Code  : [snippet of vulnerable code]
- Fixed Code    : [snippet of secure replacement]
- Fix Explained : Why this fix closes the vulnerability

---

⚠️ STEP 3 — Advisory Flags
Flag any security concerns that cannot be fixed in code alone:

| # | Advisory | Category | Recommendation |
|---|----------|----------|----------------|

Categories include:
- 🔐 Secrets Management (e.g., hardcoded API keys, passwords in env vars)
- 🏗️ Infrastructure (e.g., HTTPS enforcement, firewall rules)
- 📦 Dependency Risk (e.g., outdated or vulnerable libraries)
- 🔑 Auth & Access Control (e.g., missing MFA, weak session policy)
- 📋 Compliance (e.g., GDPR, PCI-DSS considerations)

---

🔧 STEP 4 — Hardened Code
Provide the complete security-hardened rewrite of the code:

- All vulnerabilities from Step 2 fully patched
- Secure coding best practices applied throughout
- Security-focused inline comments explaining WHY each 
  security measure is in place
- PEP8 compliant and production-ready
- No placeholders or omissions — fully complete code only
- Add necessary secure imports (e.g., secrets, hashlib, 
  bleach, cryptography)
- Use Python 3.10+ features where appropriate (match-case, typing)
- Safe logging (no sensitive data)
- Modern cryptography (no MD5/SHA1)
- Input validation and sanitisation for all entry points

---

📊 STEP 5 — Security Summary Card

Security Score:
Before Audit: [X] / 10
After Audit:  [X] / 10

| Area                  | Before                  | After                        |
|-----------------------|-------------------------|------------------------------|
| Critical Issues       | ...                     | ...                          |
| High Issues           | ...                     | ...                          |
| Medium Issues         | ...                     | ...                          |
| Low Issues            | ...                     | ...                          |
| Informational         | ...                     | ...                          |
| OWASP Categories Hit  | ...                     | ...                          |
| Key Fixes Applied     | ...                     | ...                          |
| Advisory Flags Raised | ...                     | ...                          |
| Overall Risk Level    | [Critical/High/Medium]  | [Low/Informational]          |

---

Here is my Python code:

[PASTE YOUR CODE HERE]

Overview

Python Security Vulnerability Auditor (OWASP-Mapped & Production-Hardened) is a free prompt on OpenRuna. A curated prompt on OpenRuna for builders using ChatGPT, Claude, and Cursor.

What this prompt does

"Python Security Vulnerability Auditor (OWASP-Mapped & Production-Hardened)" is designed to help you get reliable results from AI assistants for real prompt tasks. A curated prompt on OpenRuna for builders using ChatGPT, Claude, and Cursor. It is catalogued in OpenRuna's resource graph so you can discover related prompts, tools, agents, and datasets in one place. Copy the content directly into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, or Cursor — or use it as a system prompt / skill instruction where applicable.

Use cases

  • Use "Python Security Vulnerability Auditor (OWASP-Mapped & Production-Hardened)" when you need a repeatable prompt for professional workflows without writing instructions from scratch each time.
  • Adapt this prompt for team onboarding — paste into Claude or ChatGPT and iterate on the output with your project context.
  • Combine with related tools and prompts in the same OpenRuna category to build a full stack for your use case.
  • Reference during code review or planning sessions when you want consistent AI-assisted quality bars.

Example output

When you run this prompt, expect structured output similar to:

You are a senior Python security engineer and ethical hacker with deep expertise 
in application security, OWASP Top 10, secure coding practices, and Python 3.10+ 
secure development standards. Preserve the original functional behaviour unless 
the behaviour itself is insecure.

I will provide you with a Python code snippet. Perform a full security audit 
using the following structured flow:

---

🔍 STEP 1 — Code Intelligence Scan
Before auditing, confirm your understanding of the code:

- 📌 Code Purpose: What this code appears to do
- 🔗 Entry Points: Identified inputs, endpoints, user-faci…

Outputs vary by model and temperature; treat the first response as a draft and refine with follow-up prompts.

Tips by platform

Claude

In Claude, paste the full prompt as the first user message or add it to Project instructions. Ask Claude to confirm assumptions before executing. For long prompts, use Claude's artifact panel to iterate on structured output.

ChatGPT

In ChatGPT, start a new chat and paste this prompt verbatim. Enable GPT-4o or your preferred model for coding tasks. Use follow-ups like "apply this to [your context]" for best results.

Cursor

In Cursor, add key instructions from this prompt to .cursorrules or a SKILL.md file. Reference it in Agent mode with @ mentions. Keep the original title in comments so teammates can find it on OpenRuna.

Frequently asked questions

What is "Python Security Vulnerability Auditor (OWASP-Mapped & Production-Hardened)"?
It is a prompt listed on OpenRuna — A curated prompt on OpenRuna for builders using ChatGPT, Claude, and Cursor. You can copy and adapt it for ChatGPT, Claude, Cursor, or other AI tools.
Is this prompt free to use?
Most OpenRuna resources are open or CC0-licensed. Check the license on this page before commercial use. Premium collections are clearly marked.
How do I get the best results?
Replace any template variables, add your project context, and ask the model to confirm assumptions. Iterate in 2–3 follow-up turns rather than expecting a perfect first response.
Can I use this with Claude and ChatGPT?
Yes. The prompt is model-agnostic text. Tips on this page cover Claude, ChatGPT, and Cursor specifically.
Where can I find related resources?
Scroll to Related resources on this page or browse the category hub on OpenRuna to find connected prompts, tools, and agents in the same topic area.

Related resources